Guided demo
Walk through Ezelogs against your own workflow — RFIs, costs, schedule, or field.
Skip to main content
Contact Ezelogs
Talk to Ezelogs about your construction intelligence workflow
Sales, evaluations, partnerships, and support — we route every message to a real human at Qrishi Network Inc.
Real phone, real inbox, real people — sandbox does not implement form submission.
Why people contact Ezelogs
Tell us what stage you are at — we route from there
Most conversations fall into one of these intents. Pick the closest and we will route to the right team.
Pricing
Tier, seat, and module-level pricing for your team profile.
Enterprise evaluation
Security review, procurement, and multi-tenant rollout planning.
Integrations
How Ezelogs fits with your current ERP, accounting, scheduling, and field tools.
Field workflows
Mobile, offline, daily logs, observations, and trade-level rollout patterns.
AI governance
How recommendations are explained, approved, and audited.
Partnerships
Channel, implementation, AEC, insurance, and ecosystem partnerships.
Support routing
Existing customers — we route support inside the product first, then here if needed.
Role-aware contact routing
Pick the role that fits — your conversation should not feel generic
Different roles need different conversations. Tell us who you are and we will match you to the right Ezelogs context.
Owner / developer
Program-level rollouts, capital planning, and portfolio reporting.
GC / CM
Multi-project execution — costs, schedule, RFIs, submittals, field.
Subcontractor
Trade-level workflows that stay aligned to GC programs and contracts.
Supplier / vendor
Procurement, submittal, and delivery visibility against project milestones.
AEC / consultant
Engagement-bounded access, design coordination, and advisory workflows.
Public agency
Owner-agency, public infrastructure, and public-records-aware workflows.
Insurance / bonding
Project-level evidence for underwriting and surety reviews without raw data dumps.
Small business / handyman
Right-sized tier for small teams — no enterprise overhead.
What to bring
Bring operational context — not just curiosity
The best Ezelogs conversations start with one real workflow, not a feature checklist.
Workflow challenge
One workflow you want to improve — RFIs, cost drift, scheduling, closeout, safety.
Operational bottleneck
Where things slip today — handoffs, approvals, missing signals, blind spots.
Current tool stack
Tools in use now — ERP, accounting, scheduling, BIM, field, sharing.
Lifecycle phase
Where you are — capital planning, preconstruction, construction, closeout, operations.
Team roles
Who is in the conversation — owner, GC, sub, AEC, finance, field, safety.
Redacted examples
Redacted examples of the workflow help us be specific without exposing your data.
Response expectations
Conservative timing — never overstated
These are targets, not contractual SLAs. Enterprise SLAs are agreed in writing during procurement.
- Guided demo requestTargeted same-business-day response.
- Enterprise evaluationTargeted next-business-day response from a named contact.
- Pricing questionTargeted same-business-day response.
- Partnership inquiryTargeted within two business days.
- Support (existing customer)Routed through in-product support first; escalation paths documented in account.
Response-time language is a target, not a contractual SLA. Enterprise SLAs are agreed in writing during procurement.
Governance & trust
Governed AI for construction-industry intelligence
Recommendations are explainable, role-aware, evidence-backed, and bounded by tenant + project permissions. AI proposes; humans approve.
AI proposes, humans approve
Every recommendation is reviewable. High-risk workflows require explicit human approval before execution.
Role-aware access
Permissions follow your org chart — owners, GCs, subs, suppliers, finance, safety, field, and admin tiers stay separated.
Tenant boundaries
Company, project, and partner data live behind tenant boundaries. No cross-tenant blending in recommendations.
Explainable recommendations
Every signal links to its underlying records — RFIs, submittals, cost rows, schedule logs, observations.
Audit trails
Signal → recommendation → human decision → action is captured and reviewable.
Evidence-aware language
Operational claims surface the supporting evidence rather than asserting outcomes without it.
Choose your next step
Routes that match how buyers actually evaluate
Pick the path that fits your evaluation stage — every route is operational, not a brochure.
Ready when you are
Tell us one workflow. We will show you how Ezelogs surfaces it.
Sandbox does not implement form submission. Cursor wires the production form, calendar, and routing logic on merge.
Send a message
- Emailsupport@ezelogs.com
- Phone+1-516-259-1939
- HQ329 S. Oyster Bay Rd, Plainview, NY 11803, USA
- HoursMon–Fri · 9am–6pm ET